What Would You Not Find In Water That Has Been Through Tertiary Treatment?
Removal of METH through Tertiary or Advanced Treatment in a WWTP
past , , * 
and *
Geographic and Environmental Career, Department of World and Construction Sciences, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas-ESPE, Av. General Rumiñahui S/N y Ambato, Sangolquí 171103, Ecuador
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Christos S. Akratos and Alexandre T. Paulino
Received: 27 April 2022 / Revised: 30 May 2022 / Accepted: 31 May 2022 / Published: 3 June 2022
Abstract
METHs are drugs that enter wastewater through the feces and urine of users. Conventional wastewater treatment plants are non capable of removing this type of emerging contaminant, merely, in recent years, techniques have been developed to abate drugs of corruption. The present investigation focused on obtaining the technique that keeps the best residuum between the comparison criteria considered: efficiency; costs; development stage; and waste generation. That is why a bibliographic review was carried out in the scientific databases of the last viii years, terminal that the vi most pop techniques are: SBR, Fenton reaction, mixed-menses bioreactor, ozonation, photocatalysis, and UV disinfection. Subsequently, the Saaty and Modified Saaty methods were applied, obtaining a polynomial equation containing the four comparison criteria for the evaluation of the techniques. It is ended that the UV disinfection method is the one with the best relationship betwixt the analyzed criteria, reaching a score of 0.8591/1, followed by the Fenton method with a score of 0.6925/1. This research work constitutes a practical and like shooting fish in a barrel-to-use tool for decision-makers, since it allows finding an optimal treatment for the abatement of METHs. View Total-Text
► ▼ Show Figures
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in whatever medium, provided the original piece of work is properly cited
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Ponce-Arguello, G.; Abad-Sarango, V.; Crisanto-Perrazo, T.; Toulkeridis, T. Removal of METH through 3rd or Advanced Treatment in a WWTP. Water 2022, 14, 1807. https://doi.org/ten.3390/w14111807
AMA Style
Ponce-Arguello Chiliad, Abad-Sarango V, Crisanto-Perrazo T, Toulkeridis T. Removal of METH through 3rd or Advanced Treatment in a WWTP. H2o. 2022; 14(xi):1807. https://doi.org/ten.3390/w14111807
Chicago/Turabian Style
Ponce-Arguello, Mariuxi, Viviana Abad-Sarango, Tania Crisanto-Perrazo, and Theofilos Toulkeridis. 2022. "Removal of METH through Tertiary or Advanced Treatment in a WWTP" Water 14, no. 11: 1807. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14111807
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. Encounter further details hither.
Commodity Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click hither.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Source: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/14/11/1807
Posted by: hensonforgageds.blogspot.com
0 Response to "What Would You Not Find In Water That Has Been Through Tertiary Treatment?"
Post a Comment